The Court of Rome, 2644-2010 with the ruling, confirmed the address giuresprudenziale (of which we took note in the previous note) that recognizes the full usability for the purposes of payment of contributions by unions, in favor of non- signatory of the institution of credit transfer.
In fact, the Presidential Decree 180-1950, as news, not by banning the sale of the usability of the institution, we only put in place a different regulation of the supply of credit, depending on the cause of the sale is attributable to the payment of cash or loans to pay other debts.
In this regard, the Court of Rome, making the exegesis of that DPR, lucidly observes:
"the new legislation has therefore introduced a general ban on the supply of credit to pay ... but nature has only made more rigid for employees, public and private, in relation to supplies of duisciplina salary aimed extinction of cash borrowings to the clear order to counter the phenomenon of wear. The assumption of the loan is not, however, the only possible assignment of the claim, as shows the prediction
...". Article 52 In light of that decision, can therefore be regarded as guidance giuresprudenziale majority recognizes that, despite the validity of the News DPR 180 of 1950, the usability of the instrument of transfer, for the payment of union contributions to those organizations that have failed to sign the National Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Legal Network Rome Vincenzo Caponera
0 comments:
Post a Comment